接受所有 Cookie 可以确保在我们网站上获得良好的用户体验,包括个性化的内容和社交媒体功能。仅接受必要的 Cookie 将在您浏览时使用最少的 Cookie,但是网站上的部分内容可能无法正确显示。如需了解更多信息,请查看我们的 隐私政策。
What Life Sciences Firms can Learn From Other Industries About Optimizing Routine Document Production
In aerospace engineering and industries like it, structured authoring of routine yet complex documents is accepted practice. Yet, up to now this approach has eluded life sciences.
In fields with complex information needs, such as engineering, use of structured authoring is second nature – particularly in regulated industries. Organizations spanning automotive, aerospace manufacturers and power utilities have teams of people routinely coordinating structured content, populating complex documents with approved information components.
In life sciences, the set-up has traditionally been quite different. Take the teams responsible for preparing regulatory content. As medical doctors, pharmacists and chemists by background, they have tended to favor office-style content tools, such as Microsoft Word, for generating documents. The downside of this practice is that, beyond manually cutting and pasting from existing documents, teams must largely start afresh each time a new or updated submission is needed — finding the right data all over again, and compiling it under the necessary headings.
A process that is at best inefficient, and at worst laden with risk of error.
To watch the free on demand webinar “Regulatory Master Data Management – Best Practices to Get it Right” presented by Romuald Braun, please click the link